Supreme Court Seeks Responses from Punjab Government and State Election Commission on Panchayat Poll Irregularities

The Supreme Court has issued a directive for the Punjab government and the State Election Commission to respond to allegations of irregularities in the recent panchayat elections held on October 15. This directive comes after the court declined to halt the elections on the day they commenced, despite an earlier appeal that challenged the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s decision to dismiss concerns regarding the electoral process.

Justices PV Sanjay Kumar and Sanjiv Khanna of the Supreme Court have given both parties a four-week deadline to submit their replies. This order followed the High Court’s dismissal of about 800 petitions on October 14, which were primarily filed by three Dalit individuals. These individuals alleged that they were barred from filing their nominations due to interference by supporters of the ruling Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) in Punjab.

READ ALSO  Not Every time the Husband is Wrong, Courts Should Listen the Male Side Also

Initially, the High Court had halted the elections for more than 200 panchayats. However, this stay was lifted just a day before the elections, leading to the dismissal of the petitions. The Punjab government had argued that these petitions were misplaced and that the petitioners should have filed election petitions instead.

Play button

In escalating the issue to the Supreme Court, the petitioners sought a reconsideration of how their grievances were handled by the lower court. During the Supreme Court proceedings, advocate Ajit Pravin Wagh, representing the petitioners, indicated that his clients are preparing to file an election petition, which the Supreme Court has instructed to be “heard expeditiously.”

READ ALSO  How Advocate Band, Gavel and Emblem of Justice are used by Advocates on folio to obtain certified copy of orders? Asks Allahabad HC

The ongoing legal challenge underscores the complex nature of electoral integrity disputes and the judiciary’s critical role in addressing allegations of electoral misconduct. The case is significant not only for the individuals involved but also for the broader implications it holds for electoral transparency and fairness in the democratic processes at the grassroots level in Punjab.

Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner
READ ALSO  2020 Delhi riots: Court acquits 3 of arson, theft charges

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles