Supreme Court Round-Up for Oct 20

Important cases heard by the Supreme Court on Friday, October 20:

* Observing that manual scavengers have lived in bondage, systematically trapped in inhuman conditions for a long time, SC asked the Centre and state governments to completely eradicate manual scavenging across the country.

* SC dismissed a PIL challenging the restoration of Congress leader Rahul Gandhi’s Lok Sabha membership and imposed a cost of Rs 1 lakh on the petitioner.

Video thumbnail

* SC asked the Andhra Pradesh Police not to arrest TDP chief N Chandrababu Naidu in the FibreNet case till it delivers verdict on the plea in the Skill Development scam case.

READ ALSO  गर्भावधि सरोगेसी के लिए दाता युग्मकों पर प्रतिबंध सरोगेसी अधिनियम के विपरीत है: सुप्रीम कोर्ट

* SC agreed to hear on October 30 a plea by the NIA challenging the Madras High Court order granting bail to eight accused in a case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act against the alleged office bearers, members and cadres of Popular Front of India (PFI).

* SC granted anticipatory bail to Indian Youth Congress president B V Srinivas in an alleged harassment case.

* Popular Front of India (PFI) has moved SC against an Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) tribunal confirming the five-year ban imposed on it by the central government.

READ ALSO  Breaking: Supreme Court Overturns Haryana Government's 5-Marks Reservation in Employment Exams as Unconstitutional

* Observing that litigants may become disillusioned if the legal process moves at a snail’s pace, SC issued directions, including a few to the high courts, for ensuring speedy trial and disposal of old cases.

* SC refused to entertain a plea of the Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) challenging the Election Commission’s move to allot two local parties of Telangana election symbols which are “deceptively similar” to its ‘car’ symbol.

* Flagging the pendency of 21 namses recommended by its collegium for appointment and transfer of high court judges, SC told the Centre its tendency to “pick and choose” was creating a lot of problems.

READ ALSO  Merely Because Instrument of Partition Was Not Drawn, It Could Not Be Said That Partition Was Not Completed or That Joint Status of Parties Was Not Severed: Supreme Court

* SC sought the Centre’s response on a plea challenging the constitutionality of the recent amendments to the Forest (Conservation) Act.

Related Articles

Latest Articles