Supreme Court Orders Inquiry into E-Rickshaw Allotment Dispute in Matheran

The Supreme Court has mandated an investigation into the contentious issue of e-rickshaw allotments in Matheran, Maharashtra. This directive came after concerns were raised about whether e-rickshaws were properly distributed to the intended beneficiaries—hand-rickshaw pullers who are transitioning due to the hill station’s automotive restrictions.

On Wednesday, a bench led by Justice B R Gavai instructed the principal district judge of Raigad to appoint a judicial officer to conduct a thorough inquiry into the allegations. The inquiry will address claims that e-rickshaws have been wrongly allocated to hotel owners and other non-targeted groups instead of the licensed hand-rickshaw pullers.

The controversy began when the Supreme Court, on January 10, announced that e-rickshaws would be provided to hand-rickshaw pullers to mitigate the impact of losing their traditional means of livelihood. Automobiles are banned within the hill station to preserve its environment, making rickshaws a primary mode of transport for tourists and locals alike.

Play button

Further compounding the issue, in April, the court capped the number of e-rickshaws in Matheran at 20 until further clarification was provided. It also allowed e-rickshaw operators, who were former hand-rickshaw pullers, the right to use these vehicles for transporting tourists and residents.

During the recent hearing, discrepancies in the e-rickshaw allocation process were highlighted, prompting the need for judicial review. The appointed officer will hear from the local administration, representatives of the hand-rickshaw pullers, and other stakeholders, with a report due back to the court within four weeks.

READ ALSO  MLA Disqualification Matter: HC Issues Notice to Maharashtra Speaker on Shinde Faction Pleas

Also Read

READ ALSO  West Bengal ban on 'The Kerala Story': SC agrees to hear plea by producers on May 12

The bench is also addressing related infrastructural issues in Matheran, such as the laying of paver blocks on roads, which some argue could undermine the natural beauty and eco-sensitive status of the area—a concern recognized by the Ministry of Environment and Forests in a 2003 notification declaring the region an eco-sensitive zone.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles