Supreme Court Calls Out Chhattisgarh Government Over Christian Man’s Blocked Burial Rights

The Supreme Court has issued a strong reprimand to the Chhattisgarh government following a plea by a Christian man who has been prevented from burying his deceased pastor father in the village of Chhindawada. The case has highlighted significant religious and legal conflicts involving community burial rights.

Justices B V Nagarathna and Satish Chandra Sharma expressed their astonishment and concern upon learning that the deceased’s body has been kept in a mortuary in Jagdalpur since January 7, with no action taken by the local police despite the legal disputes and community objections that have prevented the burial.

READ ALSO  सुप्रीम कोर्ट की हिदायत, झुकी केन्द्र सरकार सेंट्रल विस्टा प्रोजेक्ट पर नही होगा निर्माण

The man at the center of the controversy, Ramesh Baghel, a member of the Mahra caste, is challenging a Chhattisgarh High Court order that sided with local community leaders. The High Court had upheld a decision denying Baghel burial rights in a designated Christian section of the village graveyard, citing potential unrest and public disharmony as its reason.

Play button

The village graveyard, as described by Baghel, includes designated areas for different communities, including tribal members, Hindus, and Christians. Baghel’s plea highlighted that other family members, including his aunt and grandfather, were previously buried in the Christian section without issue.

However, when plans were made to conduct his father’s burial, certain villagers vehemently objected, threatening violence and blocking access to the burial site. They also opposed the family’s attempt to bury the body on their own private land.

READ ALSO  Matrimony That Grows Bitter Does Nothing but Inflicts Cruelty on Couple, Says SC, Grants Divorce

During the altercation, Baghel reported the incident to the police, who allegedly sided with the villagers, threatening the family with legal action if they proceeded with the burial in accordance with Christian rites.

The Supreme Court has now intervened, demanding a response from the state government. The bench noted discrepancies in the local and high court’s handling of the case, questioning the state’s role in what they described as a denial of basic religious rights. The matter is set to be heard further on January 20.

READ ALSO  SC To Hear on March 21 Pleas Challenging Tenure Extension of ED Director
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles