Rule 5 Order XXII CPC Not Attracted Where There is No Conflicting Claims of Legal Representative: AP HC

Recently, the Andhra Pradesh HC ruled that Rule 5 Order XXII CPC is not attracted where there is no conflicting claims of legal representative. The bench of Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari was dealing with the case where the plaintiff-respondent No.1 filed application for a decree directing the defendants to vacate and surrender vacant possession of

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  Once Tarpaulin Falls Under Cotton Fabrics in Item-5 of Fourth Schedule to APGST Act, Inclusion of It in Item-174 of First Schedule Would Make No Difference: AP HC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Related Articles

Latest Articles