The Supreme Court of India has held that the requirement under Section 95(3) of the Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 to lay service rules before the Legislative Assembly is directory in nature, and failure to lay them does not invalidate rule amendments framed by the Registrar. Setting aside a judgment of the Chhattisgarh High Court,
Requirement To Table Rules Before Assembly Is Directory When Penalty Is Absent; Supreme Court Restores Bank Employee’s Promotion
