Remedies Under U.P. Zamindari Abolition & Land Reforms Act, 1950 Still Valid for Revisions Against Pre-2006 Decrees: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has ruled that revisions and appeals under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, remain valid for cases initiated prior to the enforcement of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, reaffirming the principle that substantive rights cannot be curtailed by subsequent procedural changes.

The decision was rendered in Charan Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors. (Writ – C No. 43025 of 2018), alongside connected cases. The matter was adjudicated by a division bench comprising Justice Siddhartha Varma and Justice Vinod Diwakar.

Background of the Case

Play button

The petitions arose from a legal dispute regarding whether appeals or revisions in cases decided under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, could still be filed under the repealed Act, given the enactment of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The specific issue, referred by the Chief Justice, was whether the remedies provided under the repealed Act could continue to apply to suits instituted prior to February 11, 2016, when the new Code came into force.

READ ALSO  Can Governor Grant Pardon to a prisoner Even if he has not Completed 14 years in imprisonment? SC Judgment

Key Legal Issue

The primary legal question was whether the remedies available under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, for revisions and appeals remained intact for decrees passed in cases filed before the enactment of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. The petitioners contended that substantive rights vested at the time of suit initiation should remain unaffected.

Court’s Observations

The court upheld the petitioners’ position, making several critical observations:

1. Vested Substantive Rights: The right to appeal or revision is a substantive right, vested from the moment a suit is filed. The court emphasized, “The institution of a suit carries with it the implication that all remedies in force at the time of filing are preserved until the litigation concludes.”

2. Continuity Through Transition: Section 230(2)(d) of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, explicitly safeguards rights, remedies, and proceedings instituted under the repealed Act. Section 231 further stipulates that pending cases will be governed by the laws in effect at their commencement.

3. No Express Bar: The bench observed that the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, does not expressly curtail the remedies available under the repealed Act. Instead, it allows for continuity in proceedings to prevent substantive injustice.

READ ALSO  Section 109 Transfer of Property Act | Attornment by the Lessee is not Necessary for the Transfer of the Property Leased Out to Him: Supreme Court

4. Legal Unity in Proceedings: Drawing from Garikapati Veeraya v. N. Subbiah Choudhry and other landmark cases, the court reinforced the doctrine that appeals and revisions are integral to a unified legal process.

Decision

The court answered the reference affirmatively, holding that revisions filed under the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950, are maintainable even after the enactment of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, provided the original suit was filed before the new Code came into force.

READ ALSO  Standard of Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt Cannot Be Applied While Considering the Petition Seeking Compensation on Account of Death or Injury in a Road Traffic Accident: SC

The judgment declared, “Any repealing law which repeals an earlier law shall not affect the remedies available to a party on the date the suit was filed. Such remedies shall remain intact unless expressly taken away by the new law.”

Parties and Counsel

The petitioners, including Charan Singh, Pyare Lal, and Gulshan E Gaeshe Azam Welfare Trust, were represented by advocates Vishal Khandelwal, Gaurav Singh, and Harsh Vikram, among others. The respondents, including the State of Uttar Pradesh and its agencies, were represented by Additional Chief Standing Counsel S.N. Srivastava and advocates Krishna Kant Singh and Neelabh Srivastava.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles