Punjab and Haryana High Court Demands Chandigarh MC’s Explanation on Alleged Landfill Data Falsification

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has called for the Chandigarh Municipal Corporation (MC) to submit a detailed affidavit addressing accusations of falsifying waste management data at the Dadumajra landfill site. This directive follows serious allegations of systematic perjury aimed at misleading the court over the management of the long-contested garbage dump.

During a recent session, Chief Justice Sheel Nagu and Justice Sumeet Goel deliberated on two separate applications brought forth by petitioner and advocate Amit Sharma in January and February 2025. These applications accuse the MC of consistent dishonesty in court statements and manipulation of waste quantity figures, respectively.

READ ALSO  In case of Circumstantial Evidence Chain of Circumstances Must Conclusively Point out the Guilt to the Particular Accused and to No One Else: Bombay HC

Sharma, representing himself, referenced a December 12, 2024, ruling by the National Green Tribunal (NGT), which he claims exposes the discrepancies in MC’s reports. According to Sharma, the NGT’s findings highlight the failure of the waste treatment plant, uncontrolled leachate issues, and the ongoing presence of legacy waste, starkly contrasting the claims made by MC in their affidavits.

Play button

In his argument, Sharma depicted a longstanding pattern of deceit by the MC, suggesting that this behavior extended over a period of 8-10 years. He accused the municipal corporation of doctoring waste management data, altering deadlines, and issuing tenders that often grossly exceeded the actual waste amounts reported, all of which failed to resolve the landfill’s issues.

READ ALSO  Highlights of SC Judgement in Article 370 Case

The MC’s counsel, Gaurav Mohunta, contested these claims, arguing that Sharma was attempting to broaden the scope of an already complex case where perjury notices had been issued previously. Sharma countered, emphasizing that his multiple applications were meant to highlight that the alleged perjury was not a one-off event but part of a broader, consistent pattern of misinformation.

Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner
READ ALSO  Detailed Inquiry is Not Required to Waive the Cooling Off Period in Mutual Divorce Application: P&H HC

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles