A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning the alleged honey-trap scandal in Karnataka, which implicates a senior minister and 48 others, including legislators, political leaders, and even a judge, has been brought before the Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna-led bench. The CJI has indicated that the matter will be taken up either today or tomorrow.
The Scandal Unfolds
The controversy erupted after Karnataka Cooperation Minister KN Rajanna revealed during an assembly session that he had been targeted in a honey-trap scheme. He further alleged that 48 individuals across political lines—spanning Congress, BJP, and JDS—had fallen victim to similar schemes. Rajanna claimed that explicit videos of the victims were being circulated to discredit them and manipulate political outcomes.
The term “honey trap” refers to a tactic where individuals are lured into compromising situations to extract information or exert influence. According to Rajanna, these traps were orchestrated by politically motivated individuals aiming to exploit their targets for personal and political gains.
Political Fallout
The allegations have sparked chaos in the Karnataka Assembly. Opposition BJP members stormed the well of the House, waving CDs they claimed contained proof of the scandal. They demanded a judicial inquiry into what they termed a “honey-trap factory” allegedly run under the Congress government. BJP leaders have also called for the investigation to be handed over to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) or a sitting High Court judge.
Chief Minister Siddaramaiah has assured that no one involved will be shielded and promised a high-level probe into the matter. However, opposition leaders remain skeptical, accusing the government of attempting to cover up the scandal.
Calls for Investigation
Several ministers and political leaders across party lines have supported calls for an impartial investigation. Public Works Minister Satish Jarkiholi revealed that there had been two failed honey-trap attempts on a senior state minister and emphasized the need for accountability. Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar also backed demands for a thorough probe.
Rajanna has urged authorities to uncover those behind these schemes, describing Karnataka as a “factory of CDs and pen drives.” He has promised to file a formal complaint with the Home Minister to facilitate an investigation.
Judicial Oversight Sought
The PIL filed before the Supreme Court seeks judicial oversight of the investigation, citing concerns about potential bias in state-led probes. The petitioners argue that given the involvement of high-profile individuals—including central leaders and a judge—a neutral and transparent inquiry is essential.
What’s Next?
As the Supreme Court prepares to hear the PIL, all eyes are on how this explosive case will unfold. The scandal has not only shaken Karnataka’s political landscape but also raised questions about ethical practices in Indian politics. With allegations cutting across party lines, this case could have far-reaching implications for governance and public trust in elected officials.
The Supreme Court’s decision on whether to take up the matter today or tomorrow will set the stage for what promises to be one of Karnataka’s most high-profile investigations in recent history.
