The High Court of Chhattisgarh has set aside the concurrent findings of the lower courts, ruling that a mere plea of oral partition is insufficient to deny a daughter her statutory right as a coparcener in ancestral property. The Court held that under the proviso to Section 6(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, only
Oral Partition Plea Insufficient to Deny Daughter’s Coparcenary Rights; Registered Deed or Court Decree Mandatory Under Section 6 Proviso: Chhattisgarh HC
