The Madras High Court (Madras HC) has ruled that oral evidence is admissible to ascertain the “true nature” of a registered document, holding that Sections 91 and 92 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, do not bar a party from proving that a document purported to be a Sale Agreement was, in fact, executed as
Oral Evidence Admissible to Prove Registered Sale Agreement was ‘Security’ for Loan; Sections 91 & 92 Evidence Act Not a Bar: Madras HC
