Kerala HC Junks PIL Against Non-Therapeutic Circumcision on Children

The Kerala High Court has dismissed a PIL seeking to declare the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision on children as illegal and a non-bailable offence, saying the petition was “purely based on newspaper reports” and was, therefore, not maintainable.

A bench of Chief Justice S Manikumar and Justice Murali Purushothaman also found that the petitioners — an NGO and some social activists — have not been able to substantiate their case.

“.. instant writ petition filed on the basis of newspaper reports is not maintainable. Giving due consideration to the material on record, we are also of the view that the petitioners have not substantiated their case,” the bench said.

Play button

It further said that it was not a law making body and therefore, the reliefs sought by NGO Non-Religious Citizens (NRC) “cannot be granted”.

READ ALSO  POSH ACT | ICC Must Observe Principles of Natural Justice, Rules Kerala HC

The NGO, in its plea, urged the court to declare the practice as a cognizable and non-bailable offence, recommend or advice or remind the Centre and Kerala government about the necessity and urgency of a legislation prohibiting it. It also sought a court direction to the police to register a case against those who perform circumcision on children or attempts or abets to do such things.

It had also requested the court to direct the union government to consider and take a decision on the NGO’s representation, seeking legislation, banning the practice on children.

Dismissing the plea, the bench said, “The court is not a law making body. Prayers sought for by the petitioners cannot be granted. In view of the above, prayer No.5 (regarding consideration of representation) sought for is also declined. In fine, writ petition is dismissed.”

READ ALSO  Judges Take Action Of Contempt Of a Court When Comments Tarnish The Majesty Of Court: Kerala HC

NRC in its plea further alleged that the practice of circumcision is a human rights violation against children.

It contended before the court that circumcision leads to several health problems, including trauma besides other risks.

The practice of circumcision is compelled to be done on the children, not as their choice but they are being compelled to be followed only because of the unilateral decision taken by the parents, wherein the child has no option, the plea said.

READ ALSO  Section 125 CrPC: Family Court Can Permit Amendment in Pleading Even in Absence of Specific Provision, Rules Kerala HC

It alleged that several incidents of deaths of infants have been reported in the country due to the practice of circumcision. The practice of this ritual is cruel, inhuman and barbarous, and it violates the valuable fundamental right, “right to life”, of the children postulated under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, it pointed out.

Related Articles

Latest Articles