High Court Exercising Discretionary Power Under Article 226 Can Refuse to Interfere in Legally Flawed Order to Achieve Substantial Justice: SC  

A Supreme Court bench comprising Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Justice R. Mahadevan has ruled that High Courts, while exercising their discretionary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution, can refuse to interfere in an order even if it suffers from legal flaws, provided that doing so would achieve substantial justice. The court criticized frivolous litigation

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  Can a Special Judge Under SC-ST Act Treat the Application U/s 156 (3) CrPC as a Complaint Case? Answers Allahabad HC
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles