HC Imposes Rs 50,000 Costs on Delhi Govt for not Filing reply to Petition

Delhi High Court on Wednesday imposed costs of Rs 50,000 on the city government for not filing a reply, despite repeated directions, to a petition seeking adequate IFS officers and deployment of CAPF to protect forests in the national capital.

Justice Subramonium Prasad said there was no valid reason given by the authorities for not filing a reply in the matter.

Not complying with court directions is against the majesty of the court, the bench said.

Video thumbnail

“Despite repeated orders dated August 2, 2023, and September 21, 2023, granting four weeks’ time to file a reply, the state government has not filed its reply. No reason has been given as to why the reply has not been filed. The only reason being given is that some information is being called from other states. This is no ground for not filing a reply in the matter,” the court said.

Justice Prasad further said, “A costs of Rs 50,000 is imposed on the state, subject to payment of which reply may be filed. Not complying with repeated directions of the court is against the majesty of the court. The majesty of the court cannot be brought down.”

READ ALSO  Supreme Court Halts Demolition of Shops Near Taj Mahal

The court was hearing a petition seeking a direction to the central government to post an adequate number of Indian Foreign Service (IFS) officers with the Delhi government’s Forests and Wildlife department.

It sought direction to the authorities to ensure that necessary steps are taken for the protection of forest rangers, guards and other field staff of the Forests and Wildlife department in terms of better protective equipment, arms and staff strength, apart from other ancillary prayers, as the staff are under tremendous pressure and are threatened and assaulted while discharging their statutory duties.

The Forests and Wildlife department’s action directly affects the right to a clean and healthy environment of the petitioner that is guaranteed by Article 21 of the Constitution, it said.

READ ALSO  Pennaiyar river dispute: Two SC judges hailing from Tamil Nadu and Karnataka recuse from hearing case

Also Read

It is a clear violation of Article 21 of the Constitution if an unarmed, un-uniformed, untrained force is made to face heavily armed and organised encroachers, poachers and smugglers, the plea said.

The petition also sought a direction to the Delhi government to establish its own forest training school and create forest stations in all the forest divisions of the city, on a par with forest stations in Kerala, for effective protection and management of forest and wildlife.

READ ALSO  'प्रावधान के वास्तविक उद्देश्य को बरकरार रखने की जरूरत': दिल्ली  हाईकोर्ट  ने पोक्सो मामले में आजीवन कारावास की सजा काट रहे व्यक्ति को छुट्टी दे दी

The Union Ministry of Home Affairs should deploy an adequate number of Central Armed Police Forces (CAPF) personnel with the Forests and Wildlife department on an urgent basis to aid and protect the lives of frontline forestry staff and largely to safeguard the city’s reserved and protected forests, the plea stated.

The high court listed the matter for further hearing on March 20.

Related Articles

Latest Articles