In a significant move to modernize the aviation industry, the government introduced the Bhartiya Vayuyan Vidheyak Bill 2024 in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday, aiming to replace the outdated Aircraft Act of 1934. As India emerges as one of the fastest-growing civil aviation markets globally, this new legislation seeks to eliminate longstanding redundancies and foster a conducive business environment.
Civil Aviation Minister K Rammohan Naidu, who presented the bill, emphasized its alignment with the Aatmanirbhar Bharat initiative, promoting self-reliance through the regulation of aircraft design and manufacturing. A notable change brought by this bill is the shift in authority for issuing the Radio Telephone Operator (Restricted) Certificate and Licence from the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to the aviation regulator, DGCA. This move is expected to streamline the process, previously marred by bureaucratic delays, and is critical for pilot training completion.
The original Aircraft Act has undergone 21 amendments over nine decades, with stakeholders frequently facing confusion and operational difficulties. Naidu highlighted the necessity of the overhaul, noting that it would address these issues comprehensively, enhance regulatory clarity, and encourage investment in aviation manufacturing and maintenance.
Furthermore, the bill grants the central government enhanced powers to manage airspace more effectively. This includes the authority to prohibit or regulate specific construction activities, issue directives, detain aircraft, and enact emergency orders when required, thus reinforcing safety and compliance in the sector.
Also Read
However, the bill has not been without controversy. During its introduction, a debate ensued over the Hindi naming of the draft legislation, sparking protests from some opposition members. Naidu defended the choice, citing recent precedents with other legal frameworks and assuring that it does not contravene constitutional provisions. Opposition from RSP member N K Premachandran highlighted the linguistic challenges, arguing that the nomenclature might alienate non-Hindi speaking regions, particularly in South India.
