Gauhati HC Orders Compensation of Rs 20 Lakh Each to Kin of 1994 Army Killings

The Gauhati High Court on Thursday directed the Centre to pay compensation of Rs 20 lakh each to the families of five youths killed by the Army in Assam’s Tinsukia district in 1994 during an anti-insurgency operation, the advocate of a petitioner said.

The court also declared the case closed in view of the long time that has elapsed, which makes it difficult to retrieve evidence or witnesses, advocate Pari Barman told PTI.

A division bench of Justices Achintya Malla Bujor Barua and Robin Phukan gave the order, she said.

Play button

“The case has been closed today. The honourable court has ordered the Union of India to pay compensation of Rs 20 lakh each to next of kin of the five deceased,” she added.

READ ALSO  सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने आर्थिक नुकसान और भविष्य में आय में वृद्धि को देखते हुए राजमिस्त्री के रूप में काम करने वाले दावेदार के मुआवजे में वृद्धि की

The case pertains to the killing of five youths who were among nine All Assam Students’ Union (AASU) members picked up by the Army from the Doomdooma circle of Tinsukia district in February 1994, following the murder of a tea estate manager by the ULFA.

Then AASU leader Jagadish Bhuyan, who later became a state minister, immediately filed a habeas corpus before the high court fearing the safety of the nine youths, which had led the Army to produce four of them alive and the bodies of the others later.

Seven personnel of 18 Punjab Regiment of Dhola camp involved in the killings were found guilty and awarded life imprisonment by an Army court in 2018.

READ ALSO  गुवाहाटी हाईकोर्ट ने असम को लॉटरी की अनुमति रोकने का आदेश दिया

Barman said the district judge of Tinsukia has been asked to identify the next of kin, who are to make their claim before it within 15 days.

The compensation amount will be deposited with the high court and it will be paid to the victims’ families as identified by the district judge, Barman said.

As the order copy was yet to be made available, it is difficult to share more details, the advocate said.

READ ALSO  Allahabad HC asks Centre, UP govt to specify schemes bringing madrasas under grant-in-aid

“Since it is an old case and it will be tough to retrieve evidence or witnesses, the court decided to close it. It was hearing two cases clubbed together, including the habeas corpus of 1994 filed by my client Jagadish Bhuyan,” Barman said.

Related Articles

Latest Articles