Executing Court Can’t Modify Arbitral Award on the basis of a Memo: Karnataka HC

Recently, the Karnataka High Court ruled that in absence of an application filed u.s 33 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act of 1996 for the correction of a typographical error in the arbitral award, the court can’t modify or correct the award based on a memo filed by a party. The Bench of Justice ES

To Read More Please Subscribe to VIP Membership for Unlimited Access to All the Articles, Download Available Copies of Judgments/Order, Acess to Central/State Bare Acts, Advertisement Free Content, Access to More than 4000 Legal Drafts( Readymade Editable Formats of Suits, Petitions, Writs, Legal Notices, Divorce Petitions, 138 Notices, Bail Applications etc.) in Hindi and English.

Click to Subscribe

If you are already a VIP Member, Click to Login Now

READ ALSO  When Can Appellate Court Invoke Power Under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC? Explains Supreme Court
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles