Delhi High Court to Hear Wrestlers’ Plea Against WFI Elections on September 12

The Delhi High Court has scheduled a hearing for September 12 regarding a petition filed by renowned wrestlers Bajrang Punia, Vinesh Phogat, Sakshi Malik, and her husband Satyawart Kadian. The petition seeks to nullify the results of the Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) elections held last year, alleging them to be illegal.

Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav has directed the involved parties—including the petitioning wrestlers who led protests last year, the Central government, and the WFI—to complete their pleadings before the scheduled hearing. The wrestlers had previously protested at Jantar Mantar, calling for the arrest of the then WFI chief Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh, accusing him of sexually harassing several female grapplers.

READ ALSO  दिल्ली हाईकोर्ट में मंगलवार को अहम मामलों की सुनवाई होनी है

The petitioners’ senior counsel highlighted concerns regarding the current federation’s leadership, especially criticizing the role of the new WFI chief, Sanjay Singh, a known associate of Brij Bhushan. The counsel pointed out Singh’s controversial presence and decision-making at the Olympic Village in Paris, where Vinesh Phogat faced disqualification for being slightly overweight before her gold medal match.

Play button

The petition further argues that the WFI elections violated the Sports Code and were conducted without adherence to the federation’s constitution. This led the Central government to suspend the WFI shortly after the elections. However, the international wrestling body UWW lifted this suspension, and the Indian Olympic Association (IOA) subsequently dissolved its ad-hoc committee overseeing wrestling.

Also Read

READ ALSO  Identity Linked to Biological Mother Is a Fundamental Right: Delhi HC Allows Woman to Replace Stepmother's Name in CBSE Records

The plea by the wrestlers also requests the continuation of the ad-hoc committee’s management of the WFI or, alternatively, the appointment of a retired Supreme Court judge to oversee the federation. The petitioners describe the WFI as a “habitual offender” of the sports ministry’s directives, which they claim has negatively impacted the careers of many Indian wrestlers.

Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner
READ ALSO  SC Explains Difference Between Power of Magistrate at Pre and Post-Cognizance Stage

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles