Delhi High Court Denies Bail to Nigerian National Accused in Matrimonial Cyber Fraud Racket

The Delhi High Court has denied bail to a Nigerian national allegedly involved in an international cyber fraud syndicate that targeted individuals through matrimonial websites and social media platforms by impersonating fake profiles.

Justice Shalinder Kaur, while dismissing the bail plea of accused Paul Onyeji Atuh, observed that the alleged offences revealed an “international and organised character of the syndicate” and a “technically sophisticated modus operandi,” making it inappropriate for the court to grant bail.

Atuh, who arrived in India on a student visa in 2020, was arrested in May 2022 from Greater Noida following a complaint lodged by a woman who claimed she was duped on the matrimonial website Sangam.com. The complainant said she was contacted by a man posing as “Dr. Ankit Verma,” purportedly a Canada-based doctor, who claimed to have been detained at Delhi Airport by customs officials for carrying excess foreign currency.

Video thumbnail

The woman was allegedly coerced into transferring ₹55,900 as a customs penalty after receiving a follow-up call from someone posing as a customs officer. A further demand of ₹1.5 lakh for “Ministry of Finance clearance” raised her suspicion, prompting her to approach the police.

READ ALSO  Is “Right to Public Holiday” a Fundamental Right? Answers Bombay HC

The cyber cell investigation uncovered that Atuh and two co-accused were operating a structured racket using 26 bank accounts, 15 mobile phones, 20 SIM cards, two laptops, and four dongle devices. Authorities seized ₹1.95 lakh in cash and froze approximately ₹4 lakh in various accounts linked to the fraud.

The police identified at least 17 victims, with cumulative losses amounting to ₹33.73 lakh.

The court cited WhatsApp conversations recovered from Atuh’s phone that linked him directly to the bank account where the defrauded amount was deposited. The judge also rejected the defence argument that Atuh was being framed, noting the absence of any mitigating circumstances and the continued custodial necessity in view of multiple FIRs and victims.

READ ALSO  Delhi High Court Round-Up for Friday

“The nature and scope of the operation… demonstrates that this was not an isolated or impulsive act of deceit, but a meticulously executed plan involving the use of fake profiles and digital morphing tools such as the ‘Ding Tone App’,” the court said in its July 11 order.

The accused has been in custody for over three years. However, the court concluded that the gravity of the offence, the scale of the fraud, and the structured operation of the syndicate outweighed arguments for bail.

READ ALSO  Can Application U/s 156(3) CrPC be Filed After failing in Civil Proceedings? SC to Consider
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles