Delhi Court Restrains Married Woman from Stalking, Harassing Man Who Rejected Her Advances

A Delhi court has passed a restraining order against a woman for allegedly stalking and harassing a married man who refused her proposal for a physical relationship.

The Civil Judge of the Rohini District Court ordered that the woman—who is herself married—must stay at least 300 metres away from the man’s residence and is barred from contacting him or his family in any form.

The court also directed that she must not stalk, follow, or harass the man or any of his family members—whether in person, over the phone, online, or through social media. Additionally, she has been restrained from trying to reach them either directly or indirectly, including through any third party.

Video thumbnail

Background

The plaintiff approached the court seeking protection from the woman, claiming that they first met at an Ashram in 2019 and began communicating thereafter. According to the man, trouble began in 2022 when he allegedly rejected her proposal for a physical relationship, stating that he was already married with children and not interested in such involvement.

READ ALSO  कलकत्ता हाईकोर्ट के जज ने बीजेपी उम्मीदवार अभिजीत गंगोपाध्याय की याचिका पर सुनवाई से खुद को अलग कर लिया

Despite this, the woman is said to have continued contacting him and even his children through social media. The plaintiff also alleged that she visited his home uninvited and pressured him to engage in a physical relationship, threatening to take her own life if he continued to avoid her.

Court’s Findings

After reviewing the facts, the court observed that the woman’s behaviour was infringing upon the man’s right to live peacefully and move freely.

Judge Renu noted that the defendant’s actions had caused substantial distress and amounted to an irreparable injury to the plaintiff’s fundamental rights.

READ ALSO  PIL Seeks Recovery of ₹1 Trillion Debt From Pakistan Owed to India, HC Says Its Government’s Policy- Know More

“Such interference causes irreparable injury,” the court concluded while issuing the injunction.

Court’s Directions

The court’s restraining order prohibits the woman from:

  • Coming within 300 metres of the plaintiff’s flat
  • Contacting the plaintiff or his family in any way, directly or indirectly
  • Using any mode of communication, including social media, to reach out to him or his family
  • Engaging third parties to do the same on her behalf

The order is expected to remain in force until further directions from the court.

READ ALSO  दिल्ली की अदालत ने पूर्व प्रेमिका का पीछा करने के लिए व्यक्ति को दोषी ठहराने का आदेश बरकरार रखा
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles