Bombay High Court Upholds College’s Decision on Hijab Ban Amid Legal Controversy

In a significant judicial decision on Wednesday, the Bombay High Court declined to intervene in a contentious ban on hijabs, burkas, and naqabs imposed by NG Acharya and DK Marathe College of the Chembur Trombay Education Society. This ruling came after a petition challenging the dress code was dismissed, affecting nine female science students in their second and third years.

Justices A.S. Chandurkar and Rajesh Patil, presiding over the case, stated they were not inclined to interfere with the college’s decision. The petitioners argued that the ban infringed upon their fundamental rights, including the right to practice their religion, the right to privacy, and the right to personal choice.

READ ALSO  HC Asks Petitioner To Deposit Rs 1 Lakh As Pre-Condition To Hear PIL On Devanagari Signboards At Mumbai Airport
VIP Membership

Altaf Khan, representing the students, presented verses from the Quran to substantiate the claim that wearing a hijab is a crucial aspect of Islamic practice. He emphasized that the ban impacted not just their religious practices but also their personal rights to privacy and choice.

Contrarily, the college administration justified the ban as a part of enforcing a uniform dress code, asserting that it was not specifically targeted at the Muslim community. Senior counsel Anil Anturkar, defending the college’s stance, clarified that the dress code was uniformly applied to all students regardless of their religious or caste affiliations.

READ ALSO  West Bengal ban on 'The Kerala Story': SC agrees to hear plea by producers on May 12

The petition described the college’s action as “arbitrary, unreasonable, bad-in-law, and perverse,” arguing it was a “colourable exercise of power.” Initially, the students had appealed to the college management and principal to lift the ban, asserting their rights to choice, dignity, and privacy in the classroom environment.

Also Read

READ ALSO  दहेज हत्या में दोषी पति हिंदू उत्तराधिकार अधिनियम की धारा 25 के तहत मृतक पत्नी की संपत्ति के उत्तराधिकार से अयोग्य: बॉम्बे हाईकोर्ट

Further, the affected students sought the support of the chancellor, vice-chancellor of Mumbai University, and the University Grants Commission, urging them to intervene and maintain an educational environment free from discrimination. After receiving no response to their grievances, they proceeded to file the petition in the High Court.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles