Bombay High Court Slams UIDAI, Tax and Bank Authorities Over Identity Theft; Orders ₹10,000 Compensation from Each for Inaction

In a scathing indictment of bureaucratic apathy, the Bombay High Court on Monday imposed a compensation of ₹10,000 each on five government and statutory authorities, including the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), for failing to act on a citizen’s repeated pleas after his identity was misused to float a shell company in Gujarat.

A division bench of Justices M.S. Sonak and Jitendra Jain pulled up UIDAI, the Gujarat Chief Commissioner, the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax (Mumbai), the Union Bank of India, and the Gujarat Commissioner of State Tax, calling it a “very sad state of affairs” that these institutions remained “motionless” for over five years.

The case involves Vilas Prabhakar Lad, a 51-year-old shopkeeper from Mumbai, who found himself embroiled in legal trouble in 2019 after receiving a rent default notice for a property in Rajkot, Gujarat. The notice named him as associated with a company called Metro International Trading—a firm he had no knowledge of.

Video thumbnail

Lad approached the Dadar police in January 2020 and discovered that his identity had been fraudulently used by unknown individuals to set up the shell firm. Despite reporting the misuse to UIDAI and Goods and Services Tax (GST) authorities and requesting deactivation of the fraudulent Aadhaar and GST numbers issued in his name, no timely action was taken.

READ ALSO  Plea Filed in SC Seeking Bail Cancellation of Ashish Mishra- Know More

In a disturbing twist, Lad later learned that Andhra Bank (now merged with Union Bank of India) had opened an account under the shell company’s name using his original documents but with a different photograph. Yet again, no criminal proceedings were initiated.

Representing Lad, Advocate Uday Warunjikar argued that the authorities failed in their duty to protect confidential identity information and sought compensation and criminal action against the fraudsters. UIDAI’s counsel contended that they had deactivated the Aadhaar number but placed the blame on the bank for failing to authenticate the documents properly.

READ ALSO  Some People Believe That BBC Is Superior to the Supreme Court of India: Kiren Rijiju

The court, however, was unconvinced. It remarked that despite clear red flags, no FIR was filed nor were any criminal proceedings initiated against the perpetrators. “There has been a total failure on the part of the authorities,” the bench said.

The High Court directed the GST department to delete Lad’s Aadhaar and PAN numbers from their database and ordered each of the five named authorities to pay ₹10,000 as compensation to Lad for their “dereliction of duty.”

READ ALSO  Bombay High Court Upholds 24-Hour Operation of Convenience Stores, Cites Economic and Consumer Benefits
Ad 20- WhatsApp Banner

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles