Supreme Court Flags Need for Common Prison Rules on Release of Terminally Ill Inmates

The Supreme Court on Friday underscored the need for uniform prison rules across states regarding the release of terminally ill and elderly prisoners, highlighting gaps in the current system and the potential for misuse without proper safeguards.

A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta reserved its verdict on a plea filed by the National Legal Services Authority (NALSA), which seeks the release of prisoners either terminally ill or above 70 years of age. The petition emphasized the inability of such inmates to approach higher courts for relief due to health and age-related constraints, particularly in the face of India’s overcrowded prison system.

While the Centre informed the bench that it had framed a standard operating procedure (SoP) advising states and union territories to take appropriate measures for managing such inmatesโ€”including exploring options for general amnestyโ€”the Court noted that prison rules remain state-specific.

READ ALSO  Supreme Court Cautions Against Indiscriminate Implication of Family Members in Domestic Violence Cases

“Ultimately, the prison rules are applicable individually to the states. All states have to come out with common prison rules, wherein consideration for release of the terminally ill must be included,” the bench observed.

The Court also expressed concern over potential misuse of the system. โ€œIdentification is different, but certification is where the catch is. There is a huge possibility of misuse,โ€ the bench said, cautioning against abuse of medical certification to secure early release.

Responding to the concern, Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, appearing for both the Centre and the Delhi government, clarified that the SoP recommends formation of medical boards to assess terminally ill inmates. She cited a case of a prisoner suffering from asthma since 1985 as an example of ongoing health-related incarcerations.

The bench also referred to extreme instancesโ€”such as a 94-year-old prisoner in Kerala and a 104-year-old convict in Jaipur Central Jail involved in a bomb blast caseโ€”underscoring the urgent need for humane reforms.

READ ALSO  เค…เคตเคฎเคพเคจเคจเคพ เค•เคพเคฐเฅเคฏเคตเคพเคนเฅ€ เคฎเฅ‡เค‚ เคœเฅเคฐเฅเคฎเคพเคจเฅ‡ เค•เฅ‡ เคคเฅŒเคฐ เคชเคฐ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ เคกเฅ‰เค•เฅเคŸเคฐ เค•เคพ เคฒเคพเค‡เคธเฅ‡เค‚เคธ เคจเคฟเคฒเค‚เคฌเคฟเคค เคจเคนเฅ€เค‚ เค•เคฐ เคธเค•เคคเคพ: เคธเฅเคชเฅเคฐเฅ€เคฎ เค•เฅ‹เคฐเฅเคŸ

Uttar Pradesh, through its counsel, said its 2018 policy already provided for medical boards to consider terminally ill inmates for release.

NALSA, in its plea, stressed that many elderly inmates whose convictions had been upheld by High Courts were unable to approach the Supreme Court for bail or sentence suspension due to health and legal resource constraints. It urged the top court to issue binding directions for the release of such inmates, noting the countryโ€™s prison occupancy rate was at 131% as of December 31, 2022โ€”seriously undermining both medical care and basic human dignity behind bars.

READ ALSO  Just Before Counting of Assembly Polls SC to hear Tomorrow PIL Seeking VVPAT Verification Before Counting Votes

The Court had earlier, on May 5, sought responses from the Centre and 18 states including Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, Kerala, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, West Bengal, and Odisha.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles