New Delhi, February 21 – The Supreme Court of India has raised concerns over the point-based assessment system used for the designation of Senior Advocates. The issue has now been referred to Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjeev Khanna for further deliberation. In response to the Supreme Court’s observations, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has decided to defer its scheduled interviews for Senior Advocate designation, which were set to begin from February 24.
A bench of the Supreme Court, while hearing a challenge to the criteria used for designating Senior Advocates, expressed doubts over the fairness and objectivity of the point-based evaluation system. The assessment process, which includes parameters such as reported judgments, pro bono work, and publications, has been a subject of debate among legal practitioners.
The Supreme Court’s intervention comes amid growing concerns within the legal fraternity that a rigid numerical system may not adequately reflect the merit and standing of advocates seeking the prestigious “Senior Advocate” designation. The matter has now been referred to the CJI, signaling a potential review of the existing framework.
Following the Supreme Court’s stance, the Punjab and Haryana High Court has decided to put the selection process on hold. The High Court had planned to conduct interviews for Senior Advocate applicants starting February 24, but in light of the Supreme Court’s concerns, the process will remain deferred until further clarity emerges.
The designation of Senior Advocates is a significant milestone in a lawyer’s career, conferring special privileges and responsibilities. The Supreme Court’s decision to revisit the assessment process could have a nationwide impact on how future designations are carried out.
More updates are expected as the Supreme Court and the CJI deliberate on the matter.
