Relief for Retired Judge Who Heard Fodder Scam Case: High Court Quashes 2009 Order

The Patna High Court has provided significant relief to retired judge Sudhanshu Kumar Lal, who was involved in hearing the infamous fodder scam cases. A bench comprising Chief Justice Vinod Chandran and Justice Partha Sarathi accepted his writ petition and quashed the High Court administration’s order issued on December 7, 2009.

The 2009 order had deferred Lal’s super-time scale salary for a year, adversely impacting his pension and other post-retirement benefits. He subsequently approached the High Court, and the decision has now come in his favor.

READ ALSO  Can an FIR be filed against a Judge?

Background of the Case

Play button

Disciplinary proceedings were initiated against retired judge Sudhanshu Kumar Lal based on allegations that, as the District and Sessions Judge (DSJ) of Jehanabad on February 11, 2004, he left his station without informing the High Court administration. It was also alleged that he secretly attended the swearing-in ceremony of a Patna High Court judge without prior permission.

Based on these allegations, Lal was found guilty, and the High Court administration penalized him by withholding his super-time scale salary for one year. This affected his pension and other retirement benefits.

READ ALSO  Supreme Court Grants Bail to Former Bhushan Steel Promoter Neeraj Singal in Bank Fraud Case

Arguments by Lal’s Counsel

Senior advocate Jitendra Singh and advocate Harsh Singh, representing Lal, argued that the departmental inquiry was flawed. They contended that no witness was examined before the inquiry officer, and the charges against their client were proved through improper means.

Court’s Directions

The court directed the Registrar General to recalculate Lal’s salary arrears and pension benefits, ensuring the application of the super-time scale. However, in another case involving Lal, the same bench refused relief. This related to a minor censure imposed on him while serving as the DSJ of Begusarai.

READ ALSO  पति द्वारा अपने नवजात शिशु के भरण-पोषण के लिए पत्नी के माता-पिता से पैसे की मांग करना 'दहेज' नहीं: पटना हाईकोर्ट

The decision to quash the 2009 order has brought significant relief to Lal, reinstating his full pension benefits and ensuring justice after years of legal battle.

Law Trend
Law Trendhttps://lawtrend.in/
Legal News Website Providing Latest Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court

Related Articles

Latest Articles